Corrections
<!-- #include virtual="/linked/head.inc" -->• William Burr’s “The Limits of Limited Nuclear War,” in the January/February issue of Arms Control Today incorrectly described the smallest nuclear option in current U.S. military war plans as an attack with 150 nuclear weapons. The relevant sentence on p. 44 should have read, “In the following years, however, U.S. war plans began to provide for truly small limited options; they now range between 2 and 120 nuclear weapons, close to what Nixon-era policymakers were seeking.”
• A headline on p. 21 of the same issue was inaccurate. The headline mischaracterized an article by Alexander Glaser and Frank von Hippel about the debate over ending the use of highly enriched uranium (HEU) in medical-isotope production. The article should have been entitled “Ending HEU Use in Medical-Isotope Production.”
<!-- #include virtual="/linked/foot.inc" -->
My Account
Help Change U.S. Nuclear Policy
Sign this petition to President Obama and make the case for ending cold war nuclear thinking.
ACA In The News
U.S. Has No Need to Test Atomic Arsenal, Report SaysNew York Times
March 31, 2012
Ghosts of Iraq Haunting C.I.A. in Tackling Iran
New York Times
March 31, 2012
Scientists Say No Need for Nuclear Tests, Boosting Obama
Bloomberg
March 30, 2012
Panel: US can maintain nuclear arms without tests
Associated Press
March 30, 2012
New Iran talks may focus on higher-grade atom work
Reuters
March 30, 2012
Congressional Report: ‘Unclear’ How Attack Would Affect Aspects Of Iran Nuke Progress
Thinkprogress | Blog
March 29, 2012







