Preventive Military Action: The Worst Way to Deal With Iran's Nuclear Program
June 18, 2009
Click here to download the full Threat Assessment Brief (PDF).
Although the possibility of Iranian nuclear weapons is a major concern for Israel and the United States, leaving the "military option" on the table is counterproductive. Preventive military action by either country against Iran's nuclear facilities would only delay, rather than halt, Tehran's nuclear program, and it would cause Iran to retaliate against the United States as well as Israel. The aftermath of such an attack would be disastrous for the U.S.position in the region-particularly for relations with Israel and with Iraq-and its position in the wider world.
My Account
Help Change U.S. Nuclear Policy
ACA In The News
U.S. Has No Need to Test Atomic Arsenal, Report SaysNew York Times
March 31, 2012
Ghosts of Iraq Haunting C.I.A. in Tackling Iran
New York Times
March 31, 2012
Scientists Say No Need for Nuclear Tests, Boosting Obama
Bloomberg
March 30, 2012
Panel: US can maintain nuclear arms without tests
Associated Press
March 30, 2012
New Iran talks may focus on higher-grade atom work
Reuters
March 30, 2012
Congressional Report: ‘Unclear’ How Attack Would Affect Aspects Of Iran Nuke Progress
Thinkprogress | Blog
March 29, 2012







