Strategic Missile Defense: A Reality Check
May 21, 2009
Click here to download the full Threat Assessment Brief (PDF).
Strategic Missile Defense offers no real disincentive for rogue regimes such as North Korea or Iran to develop or use ballistic missiles, nor does it offer any protection against the more acute threat of terrorist groups smuggling weapons of mass destruction into the United States. Instead the aggressive pursuit of strategic missile defense makes it more difficult to constrain the potential offensive nuclear threat from Russia and China.
My Account
Help Change U.S. Nuclear Policy
ACA In The News
U.S. Has No Need to Test Atomic Arsenal, Report SaysNew York Times
March 31, 2012
Ghosts of Iraq Haunting C.I.A. in Tackling Iran
New York Times
March 31, 2012
Scientists Say No Need for Nuclear Tests, Boosting Obama
Bloomberg
March 30, 2012
Panel: US can maintain nuclear arms without tests
Associated Press
March 30, 2012
New Iran talks may focus on higher-grade atom work
Reuters
March 30, 2012
Congressional Report: ‘Unclear’ How Attack Would Affect Aspects Of Iran Nuke Progress
Thinkprogress | Blog
March 29, 2012







